goat against jamc ecd (R&D Systems)
Structured Review

Goat Against Jamc Ecd, supplied by R&D Systems, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 26 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/goat against jamc ecd/product/R&D Systems
Average 93 stars, based on 26 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "Siah2 antagonism of Pard3/JamC modulates Ntn1-Dcc signaling to regulate cerebellar granule neuron germinal zone exit"
Article Title: Siah2 antagonism of Pard3/JamC modulates Ntn1-Dcc signaling to regulate cerebellar granule neuron germinal zone exit
Journal: Nature Communications
doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-55400-w
Figure Legend Snippet: A Western blot of HEK293T cell lysates transfected with Dcc-pHluorin (Dcc-pH) and JamC-HALO. Immunoprecipitation was performed using GFP or negative control IgG antibodies. Blots were probed for Dcc and HALO-tag, with the yellow arrowhead indicating the expected JamC-HALO band size. B Schematic depicting interactions between Dcc, JamC, and the polarity protein Pard3. Pard3 recruits JamC to the membrane through its PDZ1 domain, which binds the Class 2 PDZ motif at JamC’s C-terminus. JamC interacts with Dcc’s extracellular domain, while Pard3’s PDZ3 the PDZ 3 domain is predicted to interact with a Class 1 PDZ binding motif (X-S/T-X-ϕ COOH ) , , present on Dcc intracellular domain. C , D Airyscan confocal imaging of CGNs nucleofected with Dcc-pHluorin (cyan), JamC-SNAP (yellow), and Halo-Pard3 (magenta). Phluorin and the SNAP dye used here are both pH sensitive highlighting membrane-bound proteins. C Single focal plane showing overlap of Dcc with JamC and Pard3 at the proximal dilation of a CGN (white arrowheads). D Maximum projection of two CGNs forming an adhesion, showing Dcc clustering at the adhesion site before and after Ntn1 addition (200 ng/L). Dcc co-localized with JamC/Pard3 at the adhesion (white arrowhead) and accumulated at the adhesion periphery (hollow arrowhead). Five minutes after the addition of Ntn1 at 200 ng/L, the number of bright Dcc clusters (blue arrowhead) at the membrane surface increased and some newly formed clusters were recruited to the periphery of the JamC/Pard3/Dcc-positive adhesion (white arrowhead). Proximity Labelling Assay (PLA) using Duolink™ fluorescence protocol on fixed dissociated granule neurons plated on laminin and cultured for 24 h, using 2 pairs of primary antibodies: Rabbit against Dcc extracellular domain (ECD) and a Goat against JamC ECD ( E ), and Mouse against Dcc intracellular domain (ICD) and a Rabbit against Pard3 ( F ). Duolink™ staining with no primary, only one or both primaries were compared. Bar graphs represent the ratio of PLA staining intensity (Gray) against Dapi (Cyan) intensity normalized to the negative control without primary antibody (E: n = 4, F: n = 4), replicated 4 (E) and 3 (F) times with similar results. Scale bars: (C, D) 5 µm, (E-F) 10 µm. Error bars represent SEM. See Source Data File.
Techniques Used: Western Blot, Transfection, Immunoprecipitation, Negative Control, Membrane, Binding Assay, Imaging, Fluorescence, Cell Culture, Staining
Figure Legend Snippet: A , B Results of ex vivo slice culture assays under different conditions. In each case, the top curve shows the entire distribution of the radial distances of H2B-positive electroporated nuclei from the edge of the slice in replicates. Below this is a plot of the average radial distance from the edge among replicates, and below this is a micrograph representative of the nuclear distribution after 48 h in culture. All are displayed on the same scale, representing a distance from 0 to 300 µm. In addition to H2B-Cherry, the following constructs were electroporated: in ( A ), LacZ+Mir30 shLuc (control, n = 5); LacZ+Mir30 shPard3 ( n = 4); Atoh1::Ntn1+Mir30 shPard3 ( n = 4); Dcc at 0.25 µg+Mir30 shPard3(4); LacZ+Mir30 shJamC ( n = 5); Atoh1::Ntn1+Mir30 shJamC ( n = 5); and Dcc at 0.25 µg+Mir30 shJamC ( n = 3); in ( B ), LacZ+Mir30 shLuc (control, n = 5); Pard3+Mir30 shLuc ( n = 6); Pard3+Mir30 shDcc ( n = 4); JamC+Mir30 shLuc ( n = 3); and JamC+Mir30 shDcc ( n = 4). Each respective control is represented by a red dashed line in the distribution plot. C Chart representing the average variation across replicates in the endpoint nuclear displacement on the x-axis from an even probability of 50%:50%, with negative values representing an attraction to the source of the Ntn1 gradient (in red when statistically significant) and positive values representing repulsion (in blue when statistically significant). Unsorted dissociated CGNs were nucleofected and plated on laminin-coated channel microslides for 24 h, then Ntn1 was added unilaterally into the channel 10 min before the start of nuclear tracking for 2 h. Cells were nucleofected with H2B-mCherry, GPI-pHluorin, and the following: LacZ (control, n = 6), Pard3 ( n = 5), JamC ( n = 7), Mir30 shLuc (control, n = 6), Mir30 shPard3 ( n = 8), and Mir30 shJamC ( n = 6). Abbreviations: EGL external granule layer, ML molecular layer, IGL internal granule layer. In ( A ) through ( C ), error bars represent the SEM. Statistics: ˖ p ≤ 0.1, * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.005, as assessed by an ANOVA followed by a Dunnett post hoc test against the respective controls in (A) and (B) and by a chi-square test in (C) against an even probability of 50%:50%. See Source Data File.
Techniques Used: Ex Vivo, Construct, Control
Figure Legend Snippet: A , E Spinning-disk confocal live-cell imaging of dissociated granule neurons plated on laminin for 24 h after nucleofection with Dcc-pHlurorin (Dcc-pH) (cyan), GPI-TdTomato (magenta), and one of the following: in (A), LacZ (Ctrl, n = 10), Siah2 ( n = 14), Pard3 ( n = 14) or JamC ( n = 7); in ( E ), Mir30 shLuc (Ctrl, n = 9), Mir30 shSiah2 ( n = 10), Mir30 shPard3 ( n = 9), or Mir30 shJamC ( n = 9). Cells were tracked for a total of 1 h at 150 s intervals. Representative pictures for each condition show a maximum projection before (t: −1 m 15 s) and after (t: + 6 m 15 s) the addition of Ntn1 at 200 ng/mL. B Schematic representing the segmentation process for the analysis of the time-lapse images in ( A ) and ( E ). The Dcc-pH and GPI-tdTomato channels were segmented using Pixel classification with Ilastik. The resulting “clustered area fraction” is the ratio of the area of the segmented Dcc-pH regions (bright Dcc clusters) to the area of the membrane in each field of view for each time point. C , F Graphs representing the Dcc-pH area fraction over the membrane area, normalized to their respective controls. The different experimental conditions are the same as those in ( A ) and ( E ). A dashed-line marks the addition of 200 ng/mL of Ntn1 at t0. D , G Bar charts highlighting data presented in (C) and (F) for a time point before the addition of Ntn1 (t = −1 m 15 s) and for another time point shortly thereafter (t = +6 m 15 s). In D , G error bars represent the SEM. Statistics: ns, non-significant, * p ≤ 0.05, ** p ≤ 0.01, *** p ≤ 0.005, as assessed by an ANOVA followed by a Games–Howell post hoc test against the respective controls. See also Source Data File. Scale bars in (A) and (E) represent 10 µm.
Techniques Used: Live Cell Imaging, Membrane
Figure Legend Snippet: The left panel shows the various stages of CGNs and their relative layer occupancy (gray = GNPs, peach = newly differentiated CGN, blue = maturing CGN). The right panel shows the layer-specific response to Netrin-1 produced in the GZ. Siah2 degrades Dcc and Pard3 in GNPs rendering them unresponsive to Netrin-1. Newly differentiated CGNs are slightly attracted to Netrin-1, likely controlling how long these cells remain in the iEGL. Maturing CGNs express high levels of Pard3 which promotes exocytosis of JamC and Dcc and formation of larger structures at the membrane surface. The need of JamC adhesion for Dcc to exit the germinal zone in response to Netrin-1 is at the heart of the coincidence detection circuit.
Techniques Used: Produced, Membrane

